SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(P&H) 246

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASPAL SINGH ETC. – Appellant
Versus
MOHINDER SINGH ETC . – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J.

1. Appellants-defendants institute this Regular Second Appeal (here-in-after to be referred as “RSA”) to assail the concurrent findings of the Courts below, culminating in the judgment and decree dated 18.01.2000 rendered by the learned District Judge, Hoshiarpur whereby the Trial Court’s judgment and decree dated 09.10.1996 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Hoshiarpur was upheld. It is alleged that learned First Appellate Court has perpetuated a declaratory judgment founded upon conjectures rather than the material on record. The Appellants respectfully submit that the impugned judgments and decrees are vitiated by patent perversity, thereby presenting substantial questions of law that warrant a de novo examination by this Court.

2. The quintessential facts constituting the claim of the Respondents-Plaintiffs before the learned Court of first instance are as follows:-

Plaintiff-Mohinder Singh instituted the present suit seeking a declaration that the sale deed dated 16.04.1993, purportedly executed by defendant No.1, his father, in favour of defendants No.2 to 4, is null, void, and inoperative, the suit property being joint Hindu family c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top