............ vs ............ - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 1828

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1828

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KIRTI SINGH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
for the petitioner:Mr. Munish Garg, Advocate
For the State : Ms. Guramrit Kaur, DAG, Punjab.

Table of Content
1. summary of fir and case initiation details. (Para 1 , 2)
2. parties argument regarding custody and bail. (Para 3 , 4)
3. legal analysis and supreme court precedents on bail. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. establishment of bail necessity based on incarceration and trial pace. (Para 9)
5. final order granting bail with stipulated conditions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

KIRTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)

CRM-12268-2026

Application is allowed and document annexed at Annexure P-12 is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.

MAIN CASE

1. The jurisdiction of this Court under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 has been invoked for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0255 dated 13.10.2024 under Sections 137 (2), 87 of , 2023 ( Section 64 , 61(2) of , 2023 and Sections 5 , 6/17 of POCSO Act added later on), registered at Police Station Sadar Mansa, District Mansa.

2. The translated version of the FIR is reproduced below:-

“Copy of statement of Makhan Singh son of Ramjit Singh son of Santa Singh, resident of Khokhar Khurd aged about 40 years, mobile No.97812-36312, stated that I am resident of the abovesaid address and I am doing the work of painting and I am contractor of the said w