............ vs ............ - 2018 Supreme(P&H) 4836

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2018 Supreme(P&H) 4836

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, RAMESH KUMARI
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Dr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Virender Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent:Mr. Mr. Yowan Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

RAMESH KUMARI, J.

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant-husband (hereinafter referred to as ‘husband’) being aggrieved by the judgment dated 26.02.2018 passed by learned District Judge, Family Court, Bhiwani, vide which a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ‘HMA’), filed by him, has been dismissed.

2. Admitted facts are that marriage of the parties was solemnised on 07.12.2004 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. The marriage was duly consummated and one daughter was born out of their lawful wedlock. The daughter is residing with the respondent (hereinafter referred as ‘wife’).

3. The case of the husband is that marriage was simple and no dowry was exchanged as both the parties belong to different castes and it was a love marriage, which was solemnized against the wishes of their parents. The husband always made efforts to keep his wife happy and provided all the amenities to lead a comfortable life. After birth of the child, the behaviour of the wife changed. She never tried to adjust herself in the family of the husband. The husband tried to reason out with her but in vain. The wife was of quarrelsome nature and short tempered.