SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 1622

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
STATE OF HARYANA – Appellant
Versus
DATA RAM – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J.

1. The present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter referred to as “RSA”) has been preferred by the appellants–defendants/State assailing the judgment and decree dated 25.02.1997 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ambala, whereby the judgment and decree dated 15.06.1996 rendered by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ambala City, partly decreeing and partly dismissing the suit instituted by the respondents–plaintiffs, was modified.

1.1. The appellants/State seek reversal of the impugned judgment and decree and pray for dismissal of the suit of the respondents–plaintiffs, contending that the appellate interference has resulted in a substantial miscarriage of justice. It is respectfully urged that the impugned judgment and decree is vitiated by patent perversity, grave errors of law, and a fundamentally erroneous appreciation of the pleadings and evidence on record, thereby occasioning serious injustice. The appellants/State, therefore, beseech this Court to exercise its appellate jurisdiction and set aside the impugned judgment and decree.

2. The sequence of events antecedent to, and culminating in, the present appeal may be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top