SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1885

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Sandeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Priyanka Chaudhary, Advocate Mr. Pawan Kumar Goklaney, Advocate and Mr. Ashish Goklaney, Advocate Mr. Jasdeep Singh Gill, Sr. Advocate with Mr. J.S. Pannu, Advocate Mr. Randeep Singh, Advocate Mr. Ujwal Anand, Advocate Mr. Nandan Jindal, Advocate Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate Mr. K.B. Raheja, Advocate Mr. P.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate Mr. Gaurav, Advocate for Mr. Rajbir Singh, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate Mr. Parambir Singh, Advocate Mr. Gagneshwar Walia, Advocate and Mr. Fateh Singh Dhillon, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Vikas Arora, DAG, Punjab, Ms. Harkirat Kaur, Advocate with Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Singla, Advocate Mr. Anirudh Malhan, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate Ms. Tanya Bhurji, Advocate Ms. Haridhi Aggarwal, Advocate and Ms. Priya Kaushik, Advocate Mr. Vikrant Sharma, Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Soni, Advocate, Mr. Sarthak Soni, Advocate and Ms. Nishtha Grover, Advocate Mr. J.S. Bhatia, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J.

1. This common order shall dispose of all the above mentioned 18 writ petitions, as they arise from a similar factual matrix and pose a common question of law. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are taken from CWP-24697-2025.

2. Present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the impugned orders dated 01.08.2025 (Annexures P-19 to P-21) passed by the respondent-Punjab Mandi Board. By way of these orders, the respondent-Board cancelled resolutions dated 08.11.2011, 13.03.2012, 13.02.2012, 18.07.2011, and 18.08.2011, through which the petitioners’ respective appointments were originally approved. Furthermore, the petitioners seek issuance of a writ of certiorari to quash the letter dated 05.07.2002 (Annexure P-22), vide which the Government of Punjab delegated the powers of the respondent-Board, as enumerated under Section 33(4)(i), (ii) & (iii) of the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, to the Secretary of the respondent-Board. Additionally, a writ of mandamus is sought for issuance of direction to the respondents to prom

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top