SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 159

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
J.J. MUNIR, J.
Dinesh Kumar Singh – Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and Others – Respondents
Writ (A) Nos. 11172, 11275 of 2023
Decided On : 18-01-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Siddharth Khare, S.K. Srivastava.
For the Respondents: Ganesh Shanker Srivastava, Vinod Kumar Maurya.

Appointments on deputation do not confer a right to continue beyond the specified term, and the distinction between transfer and appointment on deputation is significant.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ petition challenging termination of deputation appointments - Petitioners appointed as Executive Officers on deputation for one year or until regular appointments were made - State Government issued orders terminating these appointments citing completion of tenure and regular selections - Court held that appointments on deputation do not confer a right to continue beyond the specified term, and the distinction between transfer and appointment on deputation is significant. (Paras 1, 6, 19, 39, 45)

(B) Administrative Law - Arbitrariness - The principle of non-arbitrariness requires that individual cases be considered before terminating appointments, but in this case, the appointments were temporary and contingent upon regular selections. (Paras 43, 45)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, holding permanent posts under the Government, were appointed as Executive Officers on deputation for a year based on an advertisement. Their appointments were extended, but the State Government later issued orders terminating these appointments citing regular selections.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioners had no right to continue beyond their term as their appointments were contingent upon regular selections.

Issues: Whether the petitioners had a right to continue in their positions beyond the term of their appointment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that appointments on deputation do not confer a right to continue beyond the specified term, and the distinction between transfer and appointment on deputation is significant.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

J.J. MUNIR, J.

1. This judgment will decide the present writ petition and connected Writ (A) No. 11275 of 2023. There are common questions of fact and law involved in both the writ petitions, and, therefore, the two have been heard together, with Writ (A) No. 11275 of 2023 being treated the leading case. The facts, therefore, will be noticed from the record of Writ (A) No. 11275 of 2023, where affidavits have been exchanged.

2. An advertisement was issued by the Director, Local Bodies, U.P. Lucknow dated 20th December, 2018, acting on a letter of the Government, bearing No. 3591@9&4&18&50 t@17 VhŒlhŒ fnukad 05-11-2018 advertising posts of Assistant Commissioner/ Executive Engineer Class-1/Deputy Secretary, Development Authority, Executive Engineer Class-2, Executive Engineer Class-3, besides Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, being 22, 13, 16 and 107 posts, in that order. The advertisement said that in public interest, the aforesaid posts would be filled up from amongst officials working under the Government on the basis of deputation against each of the four categories of posts. The pay-scale and the relative essential qualifications for a direct recruit were indicated. The advertisement indicated further eligibility qualifications that a government servant working in one or the other department, must possess in order to be appointed on deputation to one or the other of the posts advertised. It was also stipulated that the appointment would be valid till a regular arrangement was made or for a period of one year, whichever is earlier. The other matters mentioned in the advertisement may not be of much consequence.

3. The petitioners, who are fourteen in number in the leading writ petition, have come up with a case that each of them are holding permanent substantive posts under the Government in one department or the other, and that all of them are eligible. The petitioners, accordingly, applied in response to the advertisement for consideration of their candidature for the posts of Executive Officers, Nagar Panchayat on deputation. Each of the petitioners, being eligible, were called to interview and they faced the selection committee appointed for the purpose. Each of them were selected for appointment.

4. It is common ground that the petitioners selected for the positions of Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat were granted appointment by means of appointment orders dated 31.01.2019, 26.02.2019 and 09.03.2019. The orders of appointment granted appointment on deputation for a period of one year till a regular arrangement was made. Pursuant to the orders of appointment, each of the petitioners joined immediately and have been working as Executive Officers, Nagar Panchayat at different places. The dates of joining of each of the petitioners are indicated in Paragraph No. 17 of the writ petition, which all lie in the months of January to March, 2019. The petitioners say that subsequent to their joining on the post of Executive officer, Nagar Panchayat on deputation, they have been transferred from one place to another and served also at stations of transfer, different from the Local Body to which they were appointed or, so to speak, initially posted. The current places of posting of each of the fourteen petitioners are pleaded in Paragraph No. 19 of the writ petition, but no gainful purpose would be served by enumerating all those details.

5. It is the petitioners’ case that their work and conduct is satisfactory. There is no cause for complaint to the Local Bodies concerned, wherever they have served. The case of the petitioners further is that there is large vacancy in the cadre of the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat in the State. It is averred in Paragraph No. 21 that apart from the posts, against which officers appointed pursuant to the advertisement dated 20th December, 2018, are working on deputation, there is a vacancy of 200 posts of Executive Officers in different Nagar Panchayat of the State, which continue to

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top