SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 122

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, CJ, ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY, J.
Narayan Prasad Rabha S/o Late Ramchandra Prasad Rabha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam and Others – Respondents
W.A. No. 428 of 2023
Decided On : 30-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : R. Singha, S. Patowary, M. Goswami, D. Deka, A. Dakh, H. Ahmed
For the Respondents: B. Gogoi, D. Upamanya

Long-term employment based on transparent recruitment cannot be invalidated solely due to procedural irregularities, reinforcing principles of natural justice and legitimate expectations.

Headnote:(A) Assam Public Services (Direct Recruitment of Class-III and Class-IV Posts) Rules, 1997 - Validity of appointments - Appellants appointed as Grade-IV employees in 2004-2005 - Termination of services upheld by single judge - Court found that appointments, though irregular, were not illegal as the State's conduct and payments for 14 years indicated legitimacy - Principles of natural justice breached during termination process. (Paras 73, 92)

(B) Employment Law - Termination of service - Issue of validity based on procedural irregularities does not warrant retrospective invalidation after prolonged service - No allegations of fraud or manipulation against the appellants during the hiring process. (Paras 81, 90)

(C) Constitutional Law - Articles 14 and 16 - State cannot benefit from its own wrong by invalidating long-standing appointments made through a transparent process. (Paras 66, 88)

Facts of the case:
Appellants challenged termination of service after being employed since 2004-2005 under the Joint Director of Health Services, Assam, following Screening Committee findings of irregularities. Series of legal proceedings ensued including challenges to the validity of show-cause notices and termination orders.

Findings of Court:
Appellants’ appointments were upheld as valid despite procedural irregularities; the court emphasized compliance with principles of natural justice in termination.

Issues: Whether the appellants’ appointments were valid, and if procedural irregularities justified termination without adherence to principles of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi: Court held that long-term service under recognized appointments gives rise to a legitimate expectation of continuity; termination based on procedural grounds without allegations of fraud was unlawful.

Result: Appeals allowed; terminations quashed with reinstatement ordered.

Table of Content
1. background on appellant's appointments and terminations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding the legality and irregularities of appointments. (Para 4 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
3. court's observations on authority to appoint. (Para 45 , 46 , 47)
4. state's obligations and employee rights. (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69)
5. final judgment on the legality of the appointments and terminations. (Para 92)
6. conclusion on quashing terminations and reinstatement. (Para 93 , 94 , 95)

JUDGMENT :

ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY, J.

1. The Intra-court Appeals challenge the common judgment & order dated 29.09.2023, passed in WP(C)/1931/2020 and in the other connected writ petitions.

2. The appellants were appointed as Grade-IV employees in the year 2004-2005 against substantive vacancies under the Joint Director, Health Services, Dibrugarh and Goalpara. They continued to serve until their services were terminated in 2019. All these appellants were terminated from their services, and the termination was challenged before the learned single judge.

3. The learned single judge upheld the termination under the impugned judgment.

4. We have heard Mr. M. Goswami, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. R. Singha, learned Advocate appearing for the appellants in WA/429/2023 and WA/428/2023; Mr. R. Sharma, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. D. Deka, learned Advocate appearing for the appellants in WA/453/2023, Mr. A. Dakh, learned Sr. Advocate assisted by Ms. H. Ahmed, learned Advocate for the appellants in WA No.144/2024. Also heard Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam assisted by Mr. D. Upamanya, learned Standing Counsel for the Health and Family Welfare Department, Assam.

5. The facts, in a nutshell, in WA Nos. 428/2023, 429/2023, 453/2023 & 31/2024, are that on 4.12.2004 and 3.1.2005, two separate advertisements were issued by the Joint Director of Health Services, Dibrugarh and Goalpara, respectively, seeking applications for selection and appointment to a number of grade-IV posts. In October 2005, the respective Joint Directors issued the appointment orders, and since then, the appellants have been working and have received their salaries.

6. The appellants in WA No. 144/2024 were initially engaged during the periods of 1999-2005 on an ad-hoc or casual basis against the vacant posts and, upon completion of continuous service and availability of permanent vacancies, their services were regularised during the periods of 2009-2011 with effect from their initial dates of engagement.

7. In 2017, the allegations of illegal appointments of Surveillance Workers in the Health Department were raised. Accordingly, on 27.03.2017, the Secretary to the Government of Assam, Health and Family Welfare Department, directed the Director of Health Services, Assam, to conduct a screening process for Surveillance Workers to verify the genuineness of their services.

8. Accordingly, a screening committee was constituted on 17.05.2017 to verify appointment orders, transfer orders, and service books of all grade-IV staff, including Surveillance Workers, in all districts under the Directors of Health Services. Accordingly, the Director of Health Services, Assam, directed all the Joint Directors of Health Services of the concerned districts to submit lists of Grade-IV employees.

9. The Joint Directors of Health Services of Dibrugarh and Sivasagar directed that all Grade-IV staff under their control appear before the Screening Committee constituted for this purpose. A similar exercise was also carried out in the Goalpara district as well.

10. The procedure continued, and finally, the Grade-IV employees were directed to appear before the screening committee on 09.08.2017 in Guwahati, along with all relevant original documents to prove the genuineness of their appointments. Subsequently, in February 2018, show-cause notices were issued to Grade-IV employees whose appointments were found to be not genuine, asking why they should not be removed from service fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top