Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Krishna Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)
Prayer:
1. The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a direction to the respondents to regularize the petitioner services in terms of the Regularization Policies dated 01.10.2003 or 10.02.2004 (Annexure P-4) issued by the Government of Haryana or any other applicable policy, at par with other similarly situated employees, some of whom are stated to be junior to her.
Factual Matrix :
2. The petitioner was initially engaged as a Sewer Helper (Group-D) with the respondent-department at Sonepat Division on daily wage basis on 07.01.1997. She continued working till her services were terminated in an alleged arbitrary manner on 01.03.2011. Aggrieved, she raised an industrial dispute, and the Labour Court, vide award dated 07.04.2016 (Annexure P-1), held her termination to be illegal and ordered her reinstatement with continuity of service and 50% back wages. The writ petition filed by the department challenging the said award, CWP No. 7073 of 2017, was dismissed by this Court on 03.04.2017 (Annexure P-2). In compliance, the petitioner was reinstated w.e.f. 01.08.2017 and has since been serving with th
The court emphasized fair treatment and equal pay, mandating regularization of long-serving employees who were arbitrarily excluded from benefits, thereby reinforcing principles of equality under Art....
The court established that employees with irregular but not illegal appointments, who have served continuously for over ten years, are entitled to regularization and associated benefits, emphasizing ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
