Birender Singh vs Brahmjeet - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 1913

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1913

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Birender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Brahmjeet – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J.

1. This petition, instituted under the supervisory jurisdiction vested in this Court by Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order dated 10.12.2025 (Annexure P-6) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Narnaul. By the impugned order, the civil miscellaneous appeal preferred by the respondent/defendant was allowed, resulting in the setting aside of the well-reasoned order dated 24.09.2025 (Annexure P-7) passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narnaul. The petitioner approaches this Court seeking to impugn the said order on the ground that the same is contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional infirmities, and calls for interference in the exercise of the supervisory powers conferred under Article 227, thereby warranting this Court’s scrutiny and corrective jurisdiction.

2. The factual matrix, as emerges from the record, is that the petitioner/plaintiff is a co-owner in possession of the suit property to the extent of one-sixth share, the said property being agricultural land which has not been partitioned by any competent Court of law. The respondent/defendant, however, sought to alter the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document