Rajinder Kumar vs State of Haryana - 2026 Supreme(P&H) 512

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(P&H) 512

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Rajinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Maninder Arora, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.

1. By way of the writ petition bearing CWP No.10759-2025 petitioners are seeking quashing of impugned order dated 12.03.2025 (Annexure P-16) passed by respondent no. 4 vide which the claim of the petitioner for antedated regularization on the basis of Haryana Government Policy decision of 1979, dated 19.02.1979 (Annexure P-6) has been rejected whereas similarly placed employees have been granted antedated regularization by the respondent as per orders dated 17.02.1986 (Annexure P-7) and 19.12.2011 (Annexure P-8). Further a prayer for directing the respondents to grant the petitioner antedated regularisation along with consequential benefits on the basis of 1979 Policy.

The conspectus of Facts:

2. The petitioners are employees of the respondent Department, working as mechanics, tyre men, radiator repairers, blacksmiths and other workshop staff. They were initially appointed as Helpers on daily wage basis between September 1994 and December 1995 after due process of law and were subsequently regularized w.e.f. 01.10.2003. The grievance of the petitioners is that their services were not regularized from the date of completion of 240 days of continuous servi