Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARSH BUNGER
Rajinder – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HARSH BUNGER, J.
1. Prayer in the instant civil writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, inter alia, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside order dated 10.11.2023 (Annexure P-4), passed by Assistant Collector, 1st Grade, Rohtak (in short 'Assistant Collector'), whereby Naksha 'Kha' was approved and also order dated 29.12.2023 (Annexure P-5), passed by Assistant Collector, whereby sanad takseem was issued.
1.1 A further prayer has been made for setting aside order dated 06.05.2025 (Annexure P-7), passed by learned Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak (in short 'Divisional Commissioner'), whereby revision petition, preferred by petitioner, challenging sanad takseem/partition proceedings, has been dismissed.
2. Briefly, petitioner filed an application seeking partition of joint land measuring 200 Kanal – 6 Marla, situated at village Rithal Phogat, Tehsil and District Rohtak. In the said partition proceedings, mode of partition came to be prepared, vide order dated 10.05.2022 (Annexure P-2).
2.1 On the basis of mode of partition, Naksha 'Kha' was prepared and approved, vide order dated 10.11.2023 (Annexure P-4) and partiti
In partition proceedings, the sanctioned mode of partition based on the consent of the parties is binding. Co-sharers who participate in such proceedings and agree to partition a specific portion of ....
Partition proceedings under the Punjab Land Revenue Act do not allow introduction of new objections after the mode of partition has been finalized, reinforcing that established practices must be adhe....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
