Back
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER HARYANA
N.BALA BASKAR
Jai Ram – Appellant
Versus
Teka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. partition application and initial orders (Para 1) |
| 2. stay of proceedings after admitting revision (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments against remanding case (Para 3) |
| 4. counterarguments on partition principles (Para 4) |
| 5. rebuttal restrictions in revision (Para 5) |
| 6. nature of partition proceedings (Para 6) |
| 7. validity of partition conditions (Para 7) |
N. Bala Baskar, F.C.
Jai Ram and others, filed an application for partition of 144 kanals 6 marlas land situated in Village Umra, tehsil Hansi, district Hisar before the Assistant Collector IInd Grade, Hansi. Teka filed his objections to Naksha 'Kha'. The Assistant Collector IInd Grade directed, vide his order dated 12.10.2000, that Naksha 'Kha' be amended to the extent that keeping in view the share and possession of the parties, killa No. 242/2 should be attached to the Kurra of Teka and Killa No. 78/10 should be attached to the Kurra of the applicant and the adjustment in area according to the share of each party, should be made from the adjoining killa Nos. and that no other alteration should be made in Naksha 'Kha'. The amended Naksha 'Kha' was sanctioned by the Assistant Collector IInd Grade on 23.11.2000. Teka filed an appeal
Partition proceedings under the Punjab Land Revenue Act do not allow introduction of new objections after the mode of partition has been finalized, reinforcing that established practices must be adhe....
The court upheld the partition proceedings as lawful, confirming adherence to the approved mode of partition and dismissing claims of unjust disturbance of possession.
In partition proceedings, the sanctioned mode of partition based on the consent of the parties is binding. Co-sharers who participate in such proceedings and agree to partition a specific portion of ....
The court upheld the validity of the partition proceedings under the Punjab Land Revenue Act, affirming that due process was followed and petitioners had adequate opportunity to raise objections, whi....
Equitable allocation of land and adjustment for equitable partition are crucial in upholding the mode of partition, and disturbance of possession does not necessarily invalidate the partition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
