Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR
Mukhtiar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR, J.
1. This revision petition is directed against the concurrent findings of the learned Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority vide which petitioner/tenant (hereinafter referred to as respondent) has been ordered to be evicted from the demised premises in a petition under Section 13 of Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Act) instituted by respondent/landlord (hereinafter referred to as petitioner) in Rent Petition No.RP-29-2018 titled as “Sri Bhagwan vs. Mukhtiar Singh”, vide judgments dated 02.11.2023 and 02.01.2026.
2. The case of petitioner/landlord is that he is owner-cum- landlord of the demised shop situated at Dinod Chowk, Bhiwani, near Tibrewala Sabhakar, in which the respondent is a tenant at the monthly rent of Rs.500/- including taxes. The petitioner requires the shop in question for his own use and occupation for doing the business of selling tea and confectionery items. The petitioner is not in possession of any other shop nor he has vacated any other shop since the commencement of 1949 Act. Earlier, he was doing agricultural work but due to his old age, he is unable to do any agricultur
Landlords possess the right to evict tenants based on bona fide personal necessity, which is not undermined by their ownership of other properties deemed unsuitable for their intended use.
Pre-amendment eviction petitions from non-residential premises maintainable retrospectively due to Supreme Court on Article 14 violation. Landlord's bonafide need for prime own shops upheld despite r....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
