Mohhamed Ilyas vs Mohammed Nazir - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 2358

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2358

KARAMJIT SINGH
Mohhamed Ilyas – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed Nazir – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Jai Bhagwan, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. K.B. Raheja, Advocate for the caveator/respondent.

Table of Content
1. eviction petition based on personal necessity. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. issues framed and evidence presented. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. arguments on necessity and credibility. (Para 8 , 9)
4. bona fide requirement of landlord. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. court's affirmation of lower courts' decisions. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. time granted for compliance with conditions. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

Karamjit Singh, J. (Oral)

This order will dispose of the present civil revision petition filed by petitioner/tenant Mohhamed Ilyas for setting aside the eviction order dated 31.3.2016 passed by the Court of Rent Controller, Malerkotla, whereby the rent petition filed by respondent/landlord under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restrictions Act, 1949 (in short the Act) was accepted and judgment dated 16.3.2023 passed by the Appellate Authority, Sangrur whereby the appeal filed by petitioner against the eviction order dated 31.3.2016 has been dismissed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent filed an ejectment petition under the Act against the petitioner seeking his eviction from shop in question on the grounds of non-payment of rent, house tax and personal necess