Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAHIL – Appellant
Versus
ASHISH KUMAR AND OTHERS – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.
1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 27.11.2024 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short ‘1988 Act’), by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karnal (in short ‘the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation, granted to the appellant/claimant to the tune of Rs.3,05,620/- along with interest @9% per annum on account of injuries sustained by the appellant/claimant –Master Sahil in a motor vehicular accident, occurred on 28.06.2020.
2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the facts of the case is not required to be reproduced and is skipped herein for the sake of brevity.
SUBMISSIONS OF THE LEARNED COUNSELS FOR THE PARTIES
3. The learned counsel for the appellant/claimant contends that the compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal is on the lower side and deserves to be enhanced. Therefore, he prays that the present appeal be allowed and the compensation awarded to the appellant/claimant be enhanced, as per latest law.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the res
A minor child suffering permanent disability in a motor accident must not be treated as a non-earning individual. Compensation should be calculated using minimum wages for skilled workers, including ....
A minor child suffering permanent disability in a motor accident must not be treated as a non-earning individual; compensation for loss of income should be calculated using minimum wages for skilled ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
