Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Jaspreet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Sadhu Singh (deceased) through LRs – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.
CM-4775-C-2023
This is an application preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay of 18 days in filing the appeal.
Heard.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed and the delay of 18 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
RSA-1277-2023(O&M)
Plaintiff is in appeal against the judgment and decree dated 29.08.2022 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Rupnagar, dismissing the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 27.04.2018 passed by the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Rupnagar, vide which the suit of the plaintiff for joint possession was dismissed.
2. For the sake of convenience and clarity, parties shall be referred to as per their original status.
3. One Sadhu Singh had three sons, namely, Amrik Singh, Avtar Singh and Hardeep Singh. The plaintiff (Jaspreet Kaur) is the daughter of late Hardeep Singh son of Sadhu Singh, meaning thereby that Sadhu Singh was her paternal grandfather. She instituted a suit against Sadhu Singh. The daughter and son of Avtar Singh and the daughter of Amrik Singh, both sons of Sadhu Singh, were al
The ancestral status of property must be established through clear evidence, not presumptions; a Karta cannot alienate property without legal necessity.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
