BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J. K. MAHESHWARI
Shajal Rai alias Adrian – Appellant
Versus
State of Sikkim – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PER J.K. MAHESHWARI, J
Assailing the validity of the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2020 and the Sentence awarded on 18.02.2020 in Sessions Trial (F.T.) Case No. 04 of 2019 by the Judge, Fast Track Court, East & North Sikkim at Gangtok and challenging the findings recorded against the accused/appellant of his conviction and sentence of 10 years rigorous imprisonment and the amount of fine of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand), in default three months simple imprisonment for an offence under Section 376 (1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, IPC), this appeal has been preferred by the accused.
2. The case of prosecution, in brief, is that the accused Shajal Rai @ Adrian, aged 22 years, is a resident of Zoom Busty, West Sikkim, at present resident of 6th Mile, Tadong, East Sikkim. He is a driver by profession and was in occupation to drive a tourist vehicle bearing registration number SK01 Z-0702 belonging to Damber Bahadur Chettri of Deorali, East Sikkim. On 17.04.2019 at around 20.30 hrs., the victim’s sister while checking the mobile phone of the victim, received a call from the accused, who asked the victim’s sister to come and meet him at Putali Garden, East Sik
Yerumalla Latchaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in (2006) 9 SCC 713
Sudhansu Sekhar Sahoo vs. State of Orissa reported in (2002) 10 SCC 743
Ramesh Baburao Devaskar and others vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2007) 13 SCC 501
Mohd. Ali alias Guddu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2015) 7 SCC 272
Dinesh Jaiswal vs. State of M.P. reported in AIR 2010 SC 1540
B.C. Deva alias Dyava vs. State of Karnataka reported in (2007) 12 SCC 122
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.