UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Gudun – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Indra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the appellants, Ms. Anupriya Jaiswal, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. This appeal has been preferred by the convicts Gudun, Suresh, Jangay and Harish Chandra to set aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentencing dated 03.06.2000 passed by the XI-Additional Sessions Judge, Faizabad in ST No.827 of 1997 (State Vs. Gudun and others) arising out of Case Crime No.55 of 1997, under Sections 376, 354, 506 IPC, Police Station Khandasa, District Faizabad whereby the accused persons had been convicted under Section 376/511 IPC for five years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.2,000/-each and in case of non-payment of fine to undergo six months additional incarceration; under Section 354 IPC for one year’s rigorous imprisonment each; under Section 506(2) IPC for one year’s rigorous imprisonment each. It was also directed that all the sentences shall run concurrently.
3. In brief, facts of the case are that informant Shreepal lodged an FIR on 08.03.1997 that in the night of 03.03.1997 at about 09:00 p.m. his daughter had gone outside the house to attend the call of nature. Gudun and Musey sons of Rad
Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Maharashtra Vs. Abdul Hafees Faroki
Santosh Prasad @ Santosh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar
State of Karnataka Vs. Manjanna
State of Orissa Vs. Rama Swain and others
State of Rajasthan Vs. Biram Lal
State of Maharashtra Vs. Rameshwar Sridhar Jaware
Suresh Govinda Nagdeve Vs. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.