SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 954

RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA
Raje @ Rajesh @ Santosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Dharmendra Pratap Singh, Sushil Tiwari.

JUDGMENT :

RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.

1. Heard Sri Shyam Sundar Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Ashish Mani Tripathi, learned A.G.A. assisted by Sri Raj Kumar Mishra, State Law Officer.

2. Instant Crl. Appeal has been preferred by the accused appellant against judgment and order dated 16.1.2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehpur. By the impugned judgment, learned trial court has convicted the accused appellant for charge under Section 376, 342 and 506 IPC in S.T. No. 50 of 2002 (State of U.P. vs. Chunni Lal Sharma and Another) and sentenced him to ten years of rigorous imprisonment for charge under Section 376 IPC and Rs. 5,000/-fine with default stipulation, six months rigorous imprisonment for charge under Section 342 IPC and one year rigorous imprisonment for charge under Section 506 IPC. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

3. Co-accused Chunni Lal died during pendency of trial and trial against him abated vide order dated 9.11.2004 by the order of learned trial court.

4. Brief facts of the case relevant for present appeal are that according to prosecution version, informant Keshav Dutt Tiwari R/o Village Fatehpur Tikari, lodged an F.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top