J. K. MAHESHWARI
Radhey Shyam Swami – Appellant
Versus
Jagat Singh Singhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the criminal revision petitions (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on limitation period for complaints (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. observations on allowing fresh evidence (Para 6) |
| 4. ruling on setting aside previous judgments (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. final directions for trial court proceedings (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT
Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari; CJ.:--
Criminal Revision Petition No. 08/2015 has been filed arising out of Judgment dated 27.06.2015 passed in Criminal Appeal No.05/2013 by the Sessions Judge, Special Division-II, East Sikkim, Gangtok confirming the judgment dated 24.06.2008 and order of sentence dated 25.06.2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, East Sikkim, Gangtok convicting the petitioner of the case, Radhey Shyam Swami in Private Complaint Case No. 18/2006.
2. Criminal Revision Petition No. 01/2016 has been filed by the complainant Jagat Singh Singhi arising out of the same judgment and sentence seeking enhancement of the sentence.
3. In the present case, the arguments are heard at length of learned Counsel representing the parties. But on the point regarding Section 138 (b) and (c) read with Section 142 (1) (a) (b) (c) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short
N. Parameswaran Unni vs. G. Kannan and Anr. (2017) 5 SCC 737
The court allowed a remitting of the case for fresh evidence regarding cause of action, emphasizing that the issuance of the first notice could impact the timelines under the Negotiable Instruments A....
Dishonour of cheque – Complaint is not maintainable before expiry of period of fifteen days from date of receipt of notice by drawer of cheque – Remedy is to file fresh complaint.
The determination of the date of receipt of notice and the commencement of the statutory period for filing a complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act.
The cause of action for filing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot arise before expiry of 15 days from the date of service of notice upon the accused.
Dishonour of cheque – Complainant is not required to prove service of notice on accused before institution of case—Requirement of giving notice is a clear departure from rule of criminal law, where t....
The cause of action for filing a complaint under Section 138 arises after 15 days from the service of the demand notice, not from the notice itself.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.