SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1552

ANISH KUMAR GUPTA
Dinesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Man Mohan Singh
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Anish Kumar Gupta, J.

1. Heard Sri Man Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the entire criminal proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1397 of 2021 (Rajveer Singh vs. Dinesh Kumar) under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Police Station-Jaithra, District-Etah as well as order dated 16.08.2022.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon the judgement of the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Mamta Gautam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh passed in Criminal Revision No. 530 of 1998 dated 2.5.2000 has vehemently submitted that the instant complaint case filed by the opposite party no. 2 is time barred as the legal demand notice was sent on 18.2.2021 which was served on 19.2.2021 on the applicant, therefore the complaint ought to have been filed within one month from the date of service of notice. However, in the instant case the complaint was filed on 2.4.2021 which is beyond the period of one month from the date of service of notice, therefore, learned counsel for the applicant seeks quashing of the enti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top