SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Sikk) 13

MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN
In Re : Recent Felling of Trees In Gangtok – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Jorgay Namka, Advocate as Amicus Curiae, Ms. Yeshi Wangmo Rinchhen, Government Advocate for the State- Respondent No.1 (The State of Sikkim through the Chief Secretary), Ms. Yeshi Wangmo Rinchhen, Government Advocate with Ms. Rita Sharma, Advocate for State-Respondent No.2 (The Forest, Environment and Wildlife Management Department, Government of Sikkim), Mr. Karma Thinlay, Central Government Counsel for Respondent No.3 (The Union of India through Ministry of Road, Transport and Highways), Mr. Karma Thinlay, Central Government Counsel for Respondents No.4 (The National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited), Mr. Karma Thinlay, Central Government Counsel for Respondents No.5 (The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change), Ms. Yeshi Wangmo Rinchhen, Government Advocate for State- Respondent No.6 (The Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Sikkim), Dr. (Ms.) Doma T. Bhutia, Advocate for Respondent No.7 (Gangtok Smart City Development Limited), for the Appearing Parties

Table of Content
1. concerns raised regarding tree felling impact. (Para 1)
2. identification of respondents related to the case. (Para 2)
3. public interest and environmental suggestions presented. (Para 3)
4. compliance with rules for tree felling discussed. (Para 4)
5. arguments related to environmental protection emphasized. (Para 6 , 8)
6. key question regarding legality of administrative decisions. (Para 15)
7. procedures for auction of felled trees detailed. (Para 20)
8. emphasis on sustainable development requirement. (Para 22)
9. court’s conclusion on tree felling policies. (Para 24 , 27 , 28)

JUDGMENT

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J. - The genesis of this Writ Petition (PIL) lies in a letter petition dated 08-06-2020. The Petitioner, Kailash Pradhan, an Architect from Sikkim, being deeply troubled by the callous way that the trees in the city were being felled, averred that besides providing clean air, stabilising climate, binding soil and supporting other forms of biodiversity, trees are an intangible part of the collective memories of the residents, and give meaning to everyday urban existence. That, he was aware that the trees are required to be cleared for essential human activity and th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top