SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Sikk) 39

MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI
Kiran Chettri – Appellant
Versus
State of Sikkim – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. A. K. Upadhyaya, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rachhitta Rai, Advocate., for the Petitioners; Dr. (Mrs.) Doma T. Bhutia, Additional Advocate General with Mr. S. K. Chettri, Government Advocate and Mr. Shakil Raj Karki, Assistant Government Advocate., for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3; Mr. Zangpo Sherpa, Advocate and Mr. Dewen Sharma Luitel Advocate., for the Respondent Nos.4, 5, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 21, 26, 28, 29, 36, 37, 40, 43, 46, 51, 54, 57, 59, 61, 66, 72, 73, 77, 78, 79 and 80; None., for the Respondent Nos. R-6, R-7, R-8, R-9, R-10, R-13, R-15, R-17, R-20, R-22, R-23, R-24, R-25, R-27, R-30, R-31, R-32, R-33, R-34, R-35, R-38, R-39, R-41, R-42, R-44, R-45, R-47, R-48, R-49, R-50, R-52, R-53, R-55, R-56, R-58, R-60, R-62, R-63, R-64, R-65, R-67, R-68, R-69, R-70, R-71, R-74, R-75 and R-76

Table of Content
1. petitioners' service and promotions in irb. (Para 1)
2. request for amalgamated seniority list. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's directive to prepare seniority list. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J. - The Petitioners were appointed in the Indian Reserve Battalion (hereinafter, the 'IRB') as Constables, on 01-03-1996 and promoted variously, to the ranks of Lance Naik, Naik and Head Constables as per seniority and available vacancies in IRB Units. That, in the year 2019, they were in service for approximately twenty-three years.

2(i). Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner submits that, the only prayer in the Petition that is being pressed today is a part of prayer (iv) i.e., preparation and publication of an amalgamated Seniority list of the four forces, the second part of the prayer pertaining to the protection of the seniority of the Petitioners at the level of Head Constables is not being urged presently.

The prayer is as follows;

'Under the above facts and circumstance, it is, therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to admit this petition, call for the records and issue Rule calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a writ of mandamus/Ce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top