SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Sikk) 8

HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
Rajendra Roy – Appellant
Versus
State of Sikkim and Ors. – Respondent


ORDER :

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.

1. Heard on I.A. No.01 of 2025 which is an application filed by the Petitioner seeking the following reliefs;

(a) Issue an ad-interim injunction, suspending the operation and effect of the impugned orders dated May 14, 2025 and May 31, 2025, issued by the Respondents No.2 and 3 (Annexure P1 and P2).

(b) To allow the Petitioner to continue their business to usual location, duly consideration the provisions of Articles 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India until the final disposal of this Writ Petition;

(c) To pass such order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”

2. Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner while narrating the facts of the Petitioner's case has walked this Court specifically through the impugned Orders as well as the interim Order of the Learned Single Judge of this High Court dated 22-11-2021, in WP(C) No.39 of 2021, the Order dated 09-08-2023 and clarificatory Order dated 20-10-2023 in the same Writ Petition. It is submitted that, the interim order of this High Court recognises that, the livelihood of the Petitioner was at stake and therefore a temporary space was to be designated to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top