SUNIL AMBWANI
SUSHIL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PARBHU NARAIN YADAV – Respondent
( 2 ) THE averments in the election petition filed under Section 80 of the representation of Peoples Act 1951 are that by a notification dated 26. 12. 2001 the elections of the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly were declared. The programme of election included the beginning of nominations on 16. 1. 2002: close of nominations on 23. 1. 2002; scrutiny of nominations on 24. 1. 2002 and withdrawal of the nominations paper on 28. 1. 2002. The polling was fixed on 21. 2. 2001, and 24. 2. 2002 was fixed for counting and declaration of result. Paragraphs 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 and ground Nos. (b)and (e) of the election relevant fo r the purposes of this petition are quoted as be
Harsh Kumar v. Bhagwan Sahai Rawat
S.Baldev Singh Mann v. S.Gurcharan Singh MLA and others
Ram Sharan Yadav v. Thakur Muneshwar Nath Singh and others
Avtar Singh Brar v. Tej Singh and others
Samant N. Balakrishna v. George Fernandez and others
REFERRED TO : Borgaran Deuri v. Premodhar Bora and another
Dr.(Mrs.) Vimal v. Bhaguji and others
S.Harcharan Singh v. Sajan Singh and others
Pratap Singh v. Rajinder Singh and another
Sri M.Islam shows that in Har Swaroop and another v. Brij Bhushan Saran and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.