SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 1222

R. K. AGRAWAL, S. K. SEN
YOGENDRA RAM CHAURASIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PRAKASH PADIYA, RAVI PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA

R. K. AGARWAL, J.

( 1 ) THE present Special Appeal has been filed by Yogendra Ram Chaurasiya against the judgment and order dated 5. 5. 1997 passed by the learned Single judge, where the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition of the appellant on the ground that the appellant-writ petitioner was purely a temporary employee and even for the short period he was under employment there was several complaint against him as is evident from the perusal of annexures CA 1 to CA 7 to the counter affidavit.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated facts giving rise to the present case are that the father of the appellant- writ petitioner late Telhu baryee was working as a Lasker of 92 u. P. Battalion, N. C. C. at Ghazipur. He died while he was in service. The appellant writ petitioner being his son was given appointment on compassionate ground. The appellant was given appointment on 30. 4. 1994. It was mentioned in the appointment order that his appointment would be temporary subject to the termination under U. P. Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Service) Rules 1976. The appellant- writ petitioner accepted the said appointment and consequently he was posted as a Lasker of 92 UP battalio














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top