R. K. AGRAWAL, S. K. SEN
GENERAL MANAGER, MODIPON FIBRE CO. – Appellant
Versus
NARENDRA PAL GAHLOT – Respondent
( 1 ) THE General Manager, Modipon Fibre Company, Modlnagar, district Ghaziabad, have filed special Appeal Nos. 803, 804 and 809 of 1993 against the Judgment and order dated 1. 11. 1993 passed by the learned single Judge in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 18116 of 1993, 18117 of 1993 and 18118 of 1993, whereby the learned single Judge had allowed the writ petitions filed by Narendra Pal Gahlot, respondent-writ petitioner in Special Appeal Nos. 803 of 1993, Om Pal singh Chauhan, respondent-writ petitioner in Special Appeal No. 809 of 1993 and Atar Pal, respondent-writ petitioner in Special Appeal No. 804 of 1993.
( 2 ) SPECIAL Appeal No. 413 of 1998, has been filed by Dharam Vir, Rajendra Sharma, Hari ballabh Maheshwari, Suresh Sharma and Ahibaran Singh against the Judgment and order dated 27. 4. 1998, passed by the learned single Judge whereby the Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 30351 of 1993 filed by them has been dismissed.
( 3 ) SPECIAL Appeal No. 415 of 1998, has been filed by Jasveer Singh, Mool Chandra Gupta and hari Mohan Goyal against the judgment and order dated 27. 4. 1998, passed by the learned single judge in Writ Petition No. 30354 of 1993 wherein the lea
Referred to : Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Krishna Kant
Workmen of Pepsico India Holdings Ltd. v. Deputy Labour Commissioner, Kanpur and Anr.
Scooters India and Ors. v. Vijai E.V. Eldred
Bharat Forge Co. Ltd. v. A.B. Zodge and Anr.
Pradeep Kumar v. State Sugar Corporation and Ors.
Sudhir Chandra Sarkar v. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and Ors.
D.K. Yadav v. J.M. Industries Ltd.
V.S.T. Industries Ltd. v. V.S. T. Industries Workers Union and Anr.
Premier Automobiles Ltd. v. Kamlakar Shantaram Wadke and Ors.
Greater Bombay v. P.S.Malvenkar and Ors.
Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.