P.K.JAIN
DAYA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE two revisions by different set of accused persons have been filed challenging the order dated 19-6-97 passed by Sri P. K. Gupta, First Additional Judicial Magistrate Civil Judge, Junior Division, Rampur summoning the revisionist and others under Ss. 409 and 468, IPC.
( 2 ) OPPOSITE party No. 2 in the aforesaid revisions namely, Riyasat Khan alias Putti Khan filed a complaint against 30 accused persons, all Engineers in the U. P. Public Works Department, said to be posted at Rampur at the relevant time, for commission of the Offences under Ss. 467/468/471 and 409, IPC. The allegations made in the complaint were that the accused persons are government servants in Division I and II of the P. W. D. They have committed irregularities and thereby misappropriated government funds and prepared false records, details of which will be given at the relevant time. During the financial year ending March, 1997 several lakhs of Rupees were drawn from government exchequer and fictitious expenditure was shown and entries were made in the ledger. During the year 1996-97 false muster-roll of Daily Wagers was prepared in respect of Rampur-Swar-Bajpur road and Swar Milak Khana
Referred to : Shambhoo Nath Mishra v. State of U.P.
Satwant Singh v. State of Punjab
Shreekantiah Ramayya Munipalli v. State of Bombay
Supreme Court has raised to the case of Bhup Narain Saxena v. State
R. Balakrishna Pillai v. State of Kerala
Baij Nath v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.