O. P. GARG, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these writ petition deal with the same controversy. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged in writ petition No. 38406 of 1996. With the consent of the Parties Counsel, counter and rejoinder affidavits filed in the writ petition No. 38406/ 96 shall also be read in the connected writ petition No. 36605 of 1997. Heard Sri Vijay Bahadur Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Lalji Sinha, learned Counsel for the respondents.

( 2 ) BY means of these two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, it is prayed that the employment notice No. 1 of 1. 996 issued on 1. 11. 1996 for recruitment of the constables in Railway Protection Force (for short rpf) be quashed and the respondents be directed not to appoint any candidate selected in pursuance of the said notice of employment. It is further prayed that the recruitment made in pursuance of the employment notice No. 2/94 be directed to be given effect to and the respondents be commanded to declare the result of the said recruitment and the petitioners, if successful, may be appointed. The facts leading to the present two petitions lie in a very narrow compass. The woodcut profile of the case is as follows:in order to fill up 485 vacancies of Constables in RPF in the pay scale of Rs. 825-1200 in North eastern Railway, an employment notice No. 2 of 1994 was published on 2. 6. 1995. In all 1, 10, 669 candidates applied for the said post out of which amount 90,000 forms were found in order. After scrutiny of the forms, call letters were issued to 78,000 candidates, out-of whom 24,563 appeared for physical and efficiency test between the period 6. 5. 1995 to 6. 8. 1995. The Railway board, by letter dated 18. 4. 1995, constituted a committee for recruitment, which comprised of

(i)Sri Mawa Lal, the than Divisional Security Commissioner/ RPF, Northern Railway, lucknow, (ii) Sri Sekey Ram, retired Commandant and (iii) Sri S. A. Hussain, Divisional Security commissioner/rpf, Crime Wing. Western Railway, Bombay. The recruitment committee submitted the result to the Director General, RPF, Railway Board, respondent No. 2 on 5. 1. 1996. Papers connected with the result of the recruitment were sent for scrutiny to the Chief Security commissioner, N. E. R. , Gorakhpur who, in turn, appointed the three member Scrutiny committee. It was found on scrutiny that there were certain serious irregularities infirmities and short comings in the recruitment and broadly speaking, the four heads, under which these shortcomings and irregularities fell, were as follows: (i) Excess recruitment to the extent of 99 candidates have been empanelled as against the notified vacancies, (ii) Certain S. C. candidates who had secured more marks were not brought on merit list whereas other S. C candidates who had secures less marks have been brought on panel. (iii) Violation of extent rules/ circulars information of the panel, (iv) Procedure followed by the Recruitment Committee has not been elaborated in that at no point of time the original application forms were scrutinised/ compared and as such the possibility of impersonation by affixing different photographs in the call letter at various stages cannot be ruled out.

( 3 ) ABOVE irregularities were brought to the notice of the Chairman of the Recruitment committee, namely, Sri Mewa Lal and he was asked to remove and rectify the irregularities and mistakes in the result as pointed out by the Internal Scrutiny Committee appointed by the Chief security Commissioner, Gorakhpur. Sri Mewa Lal, it is alleged, refused to rectify and correct the mistakes/ irregularities. The Director-General, R. P. F. . taking into consideration the various irregularities, short-comings and on the ground that there were serious complaints of corruption, cancelled the whole process of recruitment, as well as result. He, it appears issued certain directions to maintain high standards and excellence in the recruitment process as well