YATINDRA SINGH
NET SINGHRAMESH KUMAR SINGH SANJAYA KUMAR VERMA – Appellant
Versus
LABOUR SECRETARY, U. P. SHASAN, RAJYA KRISHI – Respondent
( 1 ) NO decision is approved for reporting (AFR) unless it decides an important question of law. However, this decision does not decide any question of law, much less an important question of law, it is merely an interim order. Then, why have I marked it AFR? Let me clarify, I have marked it AFR to emphasise :
(i) Court management, and (ii) Good administration.
( 2 ) EDISON.-YET to find suitable filament for incandescent bulb-was asked by his friends if he hadnt failed in his many attempts. no; he answered. i have found out what will not make good filament. Well, the controversy involved in these cases and the course charted by it in this Court tells us about Court management and good administration-how these two may not be practised. THE FACTS
( 3 ) THE petitioners in these writ petitions were adhoc, or muster roll, or temporary, or work charge, or daily wage employees, of the Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, Lucknow (the parishad) or the Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti of different areas (the Samitees ). There is some difference in these five kinds of appointments. But nothing turns upon their distinction in these cases. For convenience, 1 will be using one word
Sher Shingh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
D.D.Horticulture Union v. Delhi Administration
E.Ramakrlshna v. State of Kerala
State of Haryana v. Jasmer Singh
Sanjit Roy v. State of Rajasthan
Gujarat Agricultural University v. Rathod Labhu Bechar
Mechanical Engineers Association and Ors. v. Indian Railway Traffic Service Association and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.