S.P.SRIVASTAVA, G.P.MATHUR
PRATAPPUR SUGAR AND INDUSTRIES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, GORAKHPUR – Respondent
( 1 ) THE question which requires consideration here is whether a special appeal would lie against the judgment and order of a single Judge in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution wherein an order passed by Deputy Labour Commissioner under clause (LL) of the standing orders governing conditions of employment of workmen in Vaccum Pan Sugar Factories was subject-matter of challenge.
( 2 ) SURYA Narain Shahi, respondent No. 2 was appointed as cane-observer in the appellant pratappur Sugar and Industries Limited on 25. 10. 1956 and in the service book, his date of birth was entered as 16. 12. 1935. He became eligible to become member of Provident Fund Scheme and in P. F. Form II, he made a declaration on 10. 10. 1957, that his date of birth was 16. 12. 1935. On 12. 11. 1992, he made a representation to the appellant, that the entry regarding his date of birth be changed from 16. 12. 1935 to 1. 5. 1939, which was recorded as his date of birth in his high School Certificate. No action was, however, taken on the said representation. The appellant served a notice upon respondent No. 2 that he would attain the age of superannuation (60 years)on 16. 12. 1995
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.