( 1 ) THIS case was heard along with the group of the following writ petitions : Writ Petition Nos. 3119 of 1987. 7394 of 1987. 4409 of 1988, 5515 of 1988. 12615 of 1988. 14904 of 1988. 5660 of 1989 and 5661 of 1989. By and large, the controversy raised in the writ petition is no different than in the matter of San/ay Agarwal v. Nagar Mahapalika, Allahabad and others, Writ Petition no. 3119 of 1987. decided on 20. 4. 1999. It is in these circumstances that part of the proceedings in the case of Sanjay Agarwal v. Nagar Mahapalika and others, while these matters were pending are recorded in the resume of proceedings of this case also. In all these cases, regardless of the aspect on who filed them, the issue was common. Thus, every counsel who appeared, whether in the Sanjay Agarwals case (supra) on the present case, and counsel for the State respondents alike, were agreed that the issue is : What is the concept of a public road? it was in these circumstances that all these cases were grouped together and heard together.

( 2 ) THE Court need not repeat the entire argument in the present case as these have been noticed in detail in the Sanjay Agarwals case (supra), w