SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 718

SUDHIR NARAIN
DAL CHAND AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
DIVISIONAL MANAGER, BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, POONA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.G.PADIA, RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH

SUDHIR NARAIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is directed against the order dated 17. 1. 1983 passed by the Divisional manager (Staff and Industrial Relation) Bank of Maharashtra. respondent No. 1 whereby the services of the petitioner have been terminated.

( 2 ) THE Bank of Maharashtra is a Public Sector Undertaking being one of the nationalised scheduled Bank under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act (Act XXII of 1969 ). The petitioner was appointed as Sub-Staff in the Bank of Maharashtra, meerut Branch, Meerut on 27. 9. 1979. He was confirmed and made permanent on the expiry of the period of probation of six months from the date of his appointment.

( 3 ) THE version of the petitioner is that there were complaints against the Branch Manager, respondent No. 2 regarding advancing of loan and one complaint was made by Liberty Dry cleaners of Meerut regarding non-payment of charges of washing of clothes by respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 2 suspected that in such complaint, the petitioner had a hand. He was called by respondent No. 2 and was seriously scolded. Later on, the petitioner received order dated january 17, 1983 whereby his services were termin

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top