G. P. MATHUR, D. P. MOHAPATRA
BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY – Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH – Respondent
( 1 ) SPECIAL Appeal No. 632 of 1997has been filed by Banaras Hindu University and two others against the judgment and order dated 29-5-1997 of a learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 24962 of 1996. Special Appeal No. 98 of 1998 has been filed by Medical Students Association, Institute of Medical Science, Banaras Hindu University and another against the same judgment and order. Since both the appeals are directed against the same judgment and order they are being disposed of by a common order.
( 2 ) WRIT Petition No. 24962 of 1996 was filed by Dr. Deepak Kumar Singh and Dr. Rakesh Ranjan impleading; (1) The Vice-Chancellor, Banaras Hindu University; (2) The Banaras Hindu University through its Registrar; and (3) The Director, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, praying that a writ of mandamus be issued commanding the respondents to grant them admission in Post-Graduate Course (M. D. /m. S.) on the basis of entrance examination on All India basis and for a writ of prohibition restraining the respondents to grant admission to the internal candidates belonging to the Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University on the basis of the m
Dr. Jagdish Saran v. Union of India
Nidha Marti Mahesh Kumar v. State of Maharashtra
Dr. Dinesh Kumar v. Motilal Nehru College
REFERRED TO : Dr.Chanamouga Soundaram C. v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.