( 1 ) IN the bail application moved by Dharmanand alias Mahato who has been charged u/s. 302/307 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Cantt, Lucknow I have been called upon to reconsider my decision on bail application in Criminal Misc. Case No. 3496 (B) of 1992 (Amar Singh v. State) which was decided on 24-11-1992, which has now been reported in 1992 LLJ 373.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts relating to the present application for bail are that one Kallu lodged a first information report on 8-9-1992 against the applicant at Police Station Cannt, Lucknow on the basis of which a case crime No. 281 of 1992 under S. 302/307 of the Indian Penal Code was registered against him. Along with him two other persons were also shown as accused in the case. The applicant was, thereafter, arrested.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the State have been heard. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that in the present case a charge-sheet has been filed in the court after the expiry of 90 days from the detention of the applicant. The applicant, as a matter of fact, surrendered in the court on 9-9-1992 and the charge-sheet was submitted on 10-12-1992 i.