SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(All) 82

A. N. VERMA, K. J. SHETTY, B. N. SAPRU
AGRA CONCRETE PIPE CO. – Appellant
Versus
COMPETENT AUTHORITY, AGRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.D.AGRAWAL

K. J. SHETTY, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution is directed against the judgement dated Aug. , 1, 1980 made by the District Judge, Agra in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 265 of 1978. That appeal was preferred against the order dated July 12, 1978 of the Competent Authority, Agra constituted under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act 1976.

( 2 ) PETITIONER is a firm engaged in the business of manufacture of concrete pipes. It has a factory building and also three huge ground level water tanks measuring 80 x 120, 40 x 120 and 40 x 120 separated by 6-7 feet. These are obviously meant for curing concrete cement pipes. The entire premises of the factory including the water tanks cover in all 10881. 2 sq. mt.

( 3 ) UPON coming into force of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act 1976 (the act) petitioner filed statement before the Competent Authority as required under S. 6 (1) of the Act. The Competent Authority after inquiry declared 6771. 8186 square metres as surplus land. Being aggrieved by the said order, petitioner appealed to the District Judge Agra. Pursuant to the order in the appeal, additional evidence of one V. P. Sharma Architect and registered










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top