SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 1428

ALOK KUMAR BASU, S.RAFAT ALAM
DARSHAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.S.NIGAM

( 1 ) FIVE petitioners, Darshan Kumar, Vijai Kumar, Om Prakash, Vijai Kumar son of Narain Das and Pradeep Kumar have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the Gazette Notifications dated 25-1-86 and 23-8-86 (Annexures 1 and 2 respectively), prohibiting the sale of eggs within the municipal limit of Rishikesh.

( 2 ) WHEN the writ petition was admitted on 711-86, an interim order was also passed restraining the respondents from interfering with the petitioners fight to do business of sale of eggs within the limits of Municipal Board, Rishikesh. A detailed counter affidavit along with an application to vacate the stay order was filed as early as on 13-2-87. But the case could not come up for one reason or the other and it has been listed for final hearing now. Rejoinder affidavit has also been filed.

( 3 ) SRI H. S. Nigam assisted by Sri S. S. Nigam has been heard at considerable length in support of this petition. Sri Bhartji Agarwal assisted by Sri Surendra Kumar Posti has also been heard at length in reply.

( 4 ) THE only question involved in this petition is as to whether the notification issued by the Municipal Board. Rishikesh is valid wh






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top