SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(All) 53

V. N. MEHROTRA, B. P. JEEVAN REDDY
K. N. AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MARKANDE KATJU, UPADHYAY

B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition (No. 387 of 1980) is directed against a show-cause notice issued by the commissioner of Income-tax under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why the assessment order dated September 21, 1978, relating to the assessment year 1975-76 be not revised.

( 2 ) THE impugned show-cause notice recites the following facts : for the assessment year 1975-76, the assessment in the case of the petitioner herein was made by the Income-tax Officer on September 21, 1978, on a total income of Rs. 13,08,902. From the records maintained in the office of the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (Assessment), Agra, the Commissioner found that the petitioner was a partner in the partnership firm, Shiv Narain parmendra Narain, Ranghat, Aligarh, with a share of 50%. The petitioners contention, however, was that 1/3rd of the income received towards the said share alone must be assessed in his hands and the remaining 2/3rds of the said share income should be distributed equally between his wife and his minor son by virtue of an overriding charge created by a memo of partial partition dated november 9, 1985. The












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top