SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(All) 80

J.N.TAKRU, J.D.SHARMA
JAG BHUSHAN JAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S.TEWARI, S.N.MISRA

TAKRU, J.

( 1 ) THE following question has been referred by a learned Single Judge for the decision of this bench :- "whether a person who lodges a first information report is a party interested within the meaning of Section 526 Cr. P. C. in a case prosecuted by the State".

( 2 ) SECTION 526 Cr. P. C.--hereinafter called the Code--confers power upon and lays down the condition under which, a High Court can transfer a case pending in a criminal court subordinate to its authority from that court to another criminal court of equal or superior jurisdiction, or itself try it. The manner in which, and the persons by whom, the power can be invoked are given in sub-section (3) of that section. Under that sub-section. "the High Court may act either on the report of the lower court or on the application of a party interested or on its own initiative. "

( 3 ) THE question posed above thus concerns the construction which is to be placed on the expression "party interested". Is it confined in its scope--as contended for by Mr. D. S. Tewari, learned counsel for the opposite party--to the accused and the public prosecutor, on behalf of the state in a case started by the police and a complainant in


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top