SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(All) 65

O. H. MOOTHAM, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, A. P. SRIVASTAVA
KUNDAN SUGAR MILLS, AMROHA – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN SUGAR SYNDICATE LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.Swarup, R.S.PATHAK, SURENDRA NATH VARMA

O. H. MOOTHAM, CJ.

( 1 ) I have had the advantage of reading the order prepared by Srivastava J. I agree with the conclusion at which he has arrived for the reasons stated by him. R. Dayal, J.

( 2 ) THIS is an application under Order 44, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for filing a cross-objection in forma pauperis in First Appeal No. 333 of 1957. The applicant is the Indian sugar Syndicate Limited (in voluntary liquidation) through its Liquidators four in number. Notice or the application was issued to the appellant, Kundan Sugar Mills, Amroha. A preliminary objection has been taken on behalf of the appellant to the effect that the provisions of Order 33 of the Civil Procedure Code do not apply to a limited company.

( 3 ) ORDER 33 of the Civil Procedure Code deals with suits by paupers. Its Rules 1 is: "1. Suits may be instituted in forma pauperis subject to the following provisions, any suit may be instituted by a pauper. Explanation:--A person is a pauper when he is not possessed of sufficient means to enable him to pay the fee prescribed by law for the plaint in such suit, or, where no such fee is prescribed, when he is not entitled to property worth one hundred rupees o





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top