SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(All) 19

O. H. MOOTHAM, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
KANYIALAL – Appellant
Versus
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE NORTHERN RANGE, BAREILLY, U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SATYA PRAKASH

O. H. MOOTHAM, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from an order of Mr. Justice Chaturvedi dated the 7th February, 1957, dismissing a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. On the 22nd October, 1955 the appellant who was a police constable, was served with a charge sheet under Section 7 of the police Act in which it was alleged that he had been remiss in the discharge of his duties as a police officer and unfit for the same in that he had committed certain acts of misconduct, particulars of which were specified in the charge. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, who conducted the inquiry found the charges to be established, and by an, order dated the 22nd May, 1956 he dismissed the appellant from police force. The appellant then appealed to the Inspector general of Police. Northern Range, Bareilly, but his appeal was dismissed by an order dated the 12th October, 1956. The appellant then filed a petition in this Court in which he questioned the validity of the order dismissing him from service on a number of grounds. That petition was dismissed by Mr. Justice Chaturvedi by the order which is the subject of the present appeal.

( 2 ) ONE point only has been argued on behalf of the app










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top