SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(All) 53

O. H. MOOTHAM, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, A. P. SRIVASTAVA
MOHD. MUSTAFA ALI KHAN – Appellant
Versus
RAJ RAJESHWARI DEVI – Respondent


MOOTHAM, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference made to this Court under Section 6l of the Indian Stamp Act by the Chief inspector of Stamps.

( 2 ) THE question is whether a certain promissory-note is chargeable to stamp duty as a bond, The promissory-note reads thus :

"on demand I promise to pay at Gonda to the Court of Wards, Utraula, Bilaspur Estate, district gonda, the sum of Rs. 1,50,000 with interest at 3 per cent. per annum for value received by me on 5-7-5l. "

This document, which was duly stamped, as a promissory-note, was signed by the executant and bears the signatures of two witnesses.

( 3 ) A bond is defined in Section 2 (5) of the Stamp Act as including

"any instrument attested by a witness and not payable to order or bearer, whereby a person obliges himself to pay money to another. "

The promissory-note the subject of this reference is attested by a witness and, not being expressed to be payable to order or bearer, prima facie comes within the ambit of this definition. Explanation (J) to Section 13 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a section which defines a "negotiable instrument," provides however that a promissory-note which is expressed to be payable to a particular person an











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top