SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 236

O. H. MOOTHAM, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, A. P. SRIVASTAVA
SANKATHA PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
BRIJ MOHAN PANDEY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.SANYAL, SATISH CHANDRA

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a special appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge dismissing a second appeal.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to this appeal are as follows. Dalthamnmn Pandey and Dalganjan. Pandey were brothers. Dalganjan Pandey died in 1898. leaving his widow Srimati Uttama and his daughter Srimati Gaura. Dalthamman pandey died in 1935. On 11-2-1931 he dedicated certain properties of his to some deities. He executed a will on 23-7-1921 and another will on 2-11-1923. By his first will he appointed Srimati Uttama, Srimati Gaura and Srimati Gauras father-in-law sital Pandey as his executors. By his second will he - appointed Srimati Uttama, Srimati Gaura and Jagmohan Pandey, one of the three sons then alive of Sital Pandey, as his executors. Both sital Pandey and Jagmohan, Pandey died within the lifetime of Dalthamman Pandey, the former dying in 1934 and the latter in 1924.

( 3 ) IT was provided in the first will of 1921 that after the death of Srimati Uttama and Srimati gaura, the heirs and representatives of Sital Pandey, executor No. 3, would as shebaits be worshipping executors and would look after the management of the dedicated properties according to condit



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top