SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 1670

SABHAJEET YADAV
OM PRAKASH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (MADHYAMIK) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sabhajeet Yadav, J.—Feeling aggrieved against the order dated 23.1.1996 passed by Deputy Director of Education (Madhyamik) Azamgarh Region Azamgarh the respondent No. 1 contained in Annexure 5 to the writ petition, the petitioner has filed the above noted writ petition. A further relief in the nature of mandamus was sought for directing the Committee of Management to proceed to fill up the post of lecturer in English in the institution in question afresh.

2. The relief sought in the writ petition rests on the allegations that the institution in question namely D.A.V. Inter College Maunath Bhanjan District Mau hereinafter referred to as the Institution is recognised under the provisions of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921, hereinafter referred to as the Act 1921. The institution is also receiving grants in-aid out of State fund, and is recognised under the provisions of U.P. High Schools and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and other employees) Act, 1971, hereinafter referred to as Payment of Salaries Act 1971. The provisions of U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982 hereinafter referred to as U.P. Act No. 5 of 1982, and




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top