YATINDRA SINGH, RAN VIJAI SINGH
HERO MOTORS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
Hon’ble Yatindra Singh, J.—The main question involved in these writ petitions is, ‘whether any stamp duty can be charged under. Article 23 of Schedule 1-B of the Indian Stamp Act (see Appendix-1) as applicable in our State (the U.P. Stamp Act) on the scheme of arrangement sanctioned by the court, which may be de-merger of a going concern with another company or amalgamation/merger of one company with another company.
2. The Indian Stamp Act has been amended by the different States. In order to distinguish the Acts as applicable in different States, I am prefixing the name of that State while referring to the Act as applicable in the State.
THE FACTS
WP 41811 of 2006 (Hero Motors case)
3. M/s Majestic Auto Limited (transferor company) is a public limited company, It has two units : one at Ghaziabad and another at Ludhiana. The unit at Ludhiana is manufacturing moped up to 72 cc. The unit at Ghaziabad is manufacturing moped beyond 72 cc. M/s Hero Motors Limited (the transferee company) is another public limited company manufacturing mopeds and scooters. The Board of Directors of these two companies proposed a scheme of arrangement by which Ghaziabad unit of the transferor compa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.