ANJANI KUMAR, SUDHIR AGARWAL
RAM NARAIN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
By the Court.—Aggrieved by the order dated 4.9.2003 passed by U.P. Public Service Tribunal, the petitioner has come for in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing the said order only to the extent it denies back wages from 22.7.1996 to 4.9.2003.
2. The fact giving rise to this petition, in brief, are that the petitioner was working as Lekhpal. He was placed under suspension on 14.6.1995 by the Sub-divisional Magistrate. A charge-sheet was issued on 28.8.1995 which was replied by him on 18.9.1995. The Enquiry Officer submitted his report on 14.12.1995, which was communicated to the petitioner. He submitted reply and, thereafter, the Sub-divisional Magistrate issued a show-cause notice on 15.12.1995 as to why he may be not dismissed. The petitioner replied on 2.1.1996. However, he was dismissed vide order dated 22.7.1996, whereagainst he filed writ petition No. 32357 of 1996, which was dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy of appeal before the departmental authorities. The petitioner filed an appeal, which was rejected on 9.9.1997, whereagainst his review petition was also dismissed on 22.11.1997. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed clai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.