V. G. OAK, G. C. MATHUR, T. P. MUKERJEE
Behariji Dass, Civil and Sessions Judge, Sultanpur – Appellant
Versus
Chandra Mohan, Civil and Sessions Judge, Fatehpur – Respondent
OAK, C. J. :- The question for consideration in these connected appeals is whether certain persons should be prohibited from functioning as District Judges in Uttar Pradesh. The three appeals arise out of a writ petition filed in the year 1967 by Shri Chandra Mohan against the State of Uttar Pradesh and 15 others.
2. Several years ago, the State Government established U. P. Higher Judicial Service. This service consists of two grades: (1) District and Sessions Judges, and (2) Civil and Sessions Judges. Under Article 309 of the Constitution, the Governor framed rules for appointment to U. P. Higher Judicial Service. These rules are known as U. P. Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1953 (hereafter referred to as the Rules). The Rules provide two separate methods for appointment of Civil and Sessions Judges. The first method is by promotion from the Uttar Pradesh Civil Service (Judicial Branch). The second method is by direct recruitment of advocates and Judicial Magistrates as Civil and Sessions Judges. Under these Rules, a number of persons were appointed to the U. P. Higher Judicial Service between 1953 and 1964.
3. Sri Chandra Mohan is a member of the Uttar Pradesh Civil Servi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.