SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 1356

DEVI PRASAD SINGH
Gauri Shankar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Khare, SUDHIR AGRAWAL, V.D.Chauhan,

DEVI PRASAD SINGH, J.

( 1 ) ON 6th August, 2004 while dismissing the writ petition, I have pronounced and pass the following order:

"for the reasons and observations to be followed the writ petition is dismissed, subject to condition that the petitioner shall not be compelled to discharge duty under the administrative and financial control of the Gram Panchayat. State Government shall pass appropriate government Orders forthwith in the light of observation made in the judgment. "

Now the reasons and observations in dismissing the writ petition are as under :

( 2 ) HEARD Shri Ashok Kharc, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri V. D. Chauhan learned Counsel for the petitioners and Shri Sudhir Agarwal, learned Additional Advocate General.

( 3 ) THE admitted fact of the cases is that the petitioners were working as Kisan Sahayak in the agricultural Department and in pursuance to Government Order dated 12th April, 1999 they were appointed as Gram Panchayat Vikas Adhikaris. Now by the impugned order petitioners have been reverted back to their parent departments on the post of Kisan Sahayak.

( 4 ) THE factual matrix of the case is that the State Government with intention to strengthen the function




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top