SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 444

A.MATEEN, M.K.MITTAL
PRASHANT CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
LUCKNOW GOLF CLUB LUCKNOW – Respondent


Advocates:
Anil Kumar Tewary, DIPAK SETH, JASPREET SINGH,

M. K. MITTAL, J.

( 1 ) -THIS first appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 17th July, 2007 passed by Civil Judge (S. D.), Lucknow in Regular Suit No. 428 of 2007, Prashant Chandra v. Lucknow Golf Club and others, whereby the learned Judge accepted the application filed by the defendant-respondents under Order VII, Rule 11, C. P. C. and dismissed the suit for want of jurisdiction.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that the appellant filed the Regular Suit for declaration and permanent injunction alleging that the Lucknow Golf Club (hereinafter referred as club) is a registered Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, with office at 1 Kalidas Marg, Lucknow having its own memorandum and bye-laws to govern the affairs of the Society. The plaintiff was a permanent member of the Society. The plaintiff being a Senior Advocate was engaged to argue the contempt petition filed by one Mr. Amit Magon in respect of the dispute pertaining to the elections of the defendant No. 1 in the year 2005. On the contempt petition, notices were directed to be issued to the respondent contemnors vide order dated 15. 5. 2007. Amit Magon who is also a member of defendant





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top