RAN VIJAI SINGH
HARIOM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.—Heard Sri K.K.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for the State respondents, Sri Shailendra Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 5 to 7 and Sri Vijai Bhan Singh, holding brief of Sri M.N.Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Gaon Sabha.
2. Through this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for issuing a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 11.2.20131 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Moradabad Division, Moradabad, respondent No. 2 in Revision No. 05/12-13 (Shishu Pal Singh and others v. Hari Om and others) by which the revision filed by the respondent Nos. 5 to 7 have been allowed and the petitioner’s fishery lease dated 26.9.2012 has been cancelled with the direction to initiate proceedings for grant of fresh lease.
3. Sri K.K.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner while assailing the order impugned submitted that the order is without jurisdiction as against the order granting the fishery lease or lease a revision would not be maintainable. In his submission as the lease was granted under the provisions of the Government Order d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.